Figure A2. Agattu anomaly, interpreted as the Agattu slab, with (horizontal) [vertical] cross sections through (A)[D] the UUP07 p-wave) and (B)[D] the combined SL2013 and S40RTS s-wave models at 870 km; C) the location of the modern geological record that … Continue reading →
Figure A68. North Pacific anomaly, interpreted as the North Pacific slab, with (horizontal) [vertical] cross sections through (A)[D] the UUP07 p-wave) and (B)[D] the combined SL2013 and S40RTS s-wave models at 1110 km; C) the location of the modern geological … Continue reading →
Figure A58. Mayn anomaly, interpreted as the Mayn slab, with (horizontal) [vertical] cross sections through (A)[D] the UUP07 p-wave) and (B)[D] the combined SL2013 and S40RTS s-wave models at 310 km; C) the location of the modern geological record that … Continue reading →
Figure A29. Cocos anomaly, interpreted as the Cocos slab, with (horizontal) [vertical] cross sections through (A)[D] the UUP07 p-wave) and (B)[D] the combined SL2013 and S40RTS s-wave models at 1290 km; C) the location of the modern geological record that … Continue reading →
Figure A9. Arabia anomaly, interpreted as the Arabia slab, with (horizontal) [vertical] cross sections through (A)[D] the UUP07 p-wave) and (B)[D] the combined SL2013 and S40RTS s-wave models at 1410 km; C) the location of the modern geological record that … Continue reading →
Update March 4, 2018: The age of the base of the Emporios slab may be considerably older than estimated in the original publication of the Atlas of van der Meer et al. (2018). Originally, we interpreted the base of … Continue reading →
The Carpathian anomaly (Figure 28) is found draped on the 660 km discontinuity below the Carpathian oroclinal fold-thrust belt and its back-arc region, the Pannonian basin. It has been long known and is imaged in numerous tomographic models (Spakman 1991; … Continue reading →
A northward dipping anomaly is located below the Zagros mountains of Iran in the upper mantle and in the upper part of the lower mantle (Hafkenscheid et al., 2006; Zor, 2008; Chang et al., 2010; Agard et al., 2011; Koulakov, … Continue reading →
The Yukon anomaly (Figure A93) is located below northwestern North America and is within the upper part of the lower mantle. Previously, van der Meer et al. (2010) interpreted it to be part of the North Pacific slab. By closely … Continue reading →
The Welford anomaly (Figure A92) corresponds to the southwestern part of the A7 anomaly of Hall and Spakman (2002; 2004) and underlies NE Australia, flat-lying at the top of the lower and base of the upper mantle. Hall and Spakman … Continue reading →
